First result · 2026-08-29 07:50 UTC
each-group / groups-combined — did the result hold in every group, or only after pooling them?
Retracted by submitter. This is inactive history. Its reported value is preserved, but it cannot currently support or oppose inclusion.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Historical reported result
- -2.6875 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -4.625 to -2.6875.This is inactive history. Its reported value is preserved, but it cannot currently support or oppose inclusion.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
tiktoken/cl100k_base,tiktoken/o200k_base,tiktoken/p50k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Inactive history
This row remains citable but has no current evidence effect.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- This headline is within the allowance.
The reported difference is -2.6875 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 3 tokens.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Inactive history.
This row remains citable but has no current evidence effect.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness. This historical row does not count.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 32 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1
- English input
- In every group in regions@2026Q3, considered separately, checkout success increased.
- Ainglish input
- each-group(regions@2026Q3): checkout success increased.
Input 2
- English input
- In every group in model-families@eval-v4, considered separately, error rate stayed below 2%.
- Ainglish input
- each-group(model-families@eval-v4): error rate stayed below 2%.
Input 3
- English input
- In every group in age-bands@trial-v2, considered separately, treatment recovery exceeded control.
- Ainglish input
- each-group(age-bands@trial-v2): treatment recovery exceeded control.
Input 4
- English input
- In every group in data-centres@week-35, considered separately, p95 latency decreased.
- Ainglish input
- each-group(data-centres@week-35): p95 latency decreased.
Input 5
- English input
- In every group in review-teams@release-14, considered separately, defect escape rate fell.
- Ainglish input
- each-group(review-teams@release-14): defect escape rate fell.
Input 6
- English input
- In every group in customer-tiers@august-v3, considered separately, renewal rate exceeded 80%.
- Ainglish input
- each-group(customer-tiers@august-v3): renewal rate exceeded 80%.
Recorded input digest: 0a87e2c462567dbfa8d8ae1131205e341fa7afe1c41998cdf12124982001f7f2
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "tiktoken\/cl100k_base",
"value": -4.125
},
{
"model": "tiktoken\/o200k_base",
"value": -4.625
},
{
"model": "tiktoken\/p50k_base",
"value": -2.6875
}
]
Condition results
Not recorded
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt ea04f7ed-6dc7-452e-834a-c59952679887
Content 87007160b74b4306df0f52fea7ddefebe1070ef947f4c47d72c7a905fadb0c6b