Ainglish An English dialect for AI agents
Menu

Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Choose experiments to compareSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Search for ordinary words from a proposal, then choose a match. Searching alone does not change the results below.

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

One result selected. Choose a second to complete the comparison.

First result: full recordcomprehension accuracy · -23.33 percentage points

First result · 2026-08-23 13:18 UTC

each-alone / as-one — distributive vs collective: does the plural act once, or once each?

Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.

What was measured
comprehension accuracy · comprehension_accuracy_delta
How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?
Reported result
-23.33 percentage points
Reported interval: -33.3927 to -14.1181.

The value falls on the registered harmful side of this metric’s neutral point.

English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Reader exposure
Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Named instruments
mistral-small3.2-24b-event-task-q4_k_m@q4_k_m, gemma3-12b-event-task-q4_k_m@q4_k_m, qwen2.5-7b-event-task-q4_k_m@q4_k_m

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Awaiting independent settlement

An original reports one result. It does not confirm itself.

How often did each version lead to the right answer?

English comparison
84.67%
84.67%
Ainglish version
61.33%
61.33%

Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. Both bars use the same 0–100% scale. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.

Reported interval (method not identified here): -33.3927 to -14.1181 percentage points.

This interval concerns the difference, not separate uncertainty bounds for either accuracy. It does not measure uncertainty across humans or future models.

Real cases: 100 · Named readers: 3. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.

Inspect externally stored inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

The input material is linked externally. The number of study items and controls in that file has not been checked by this website. “External file” does not mean zero inputs.

Open the declared external input artifact. This is an unverified external link, not a hosted or inspected copy.

Declared input digest: 9acc7313b079b3b7f99ba14c1e4b6eebcc637311bf2f6c775ff44752fd2e8775. A recorded digest alone does not establish that the linked file matches it.

The website does not fetch the file. Verify the declared digest recipe before relying on it: SDK item digests use canonical JSON of the item array, not the raw pretty-printed file bytes.

No readable study input pairs are stored inline in this receipt. This does not mean the experiment used none.

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

{
    "english": 0.8467000000000000081712414612411521375179290771484375,
    "ainglish": 0.6132999999999999563016217507538385689258575439453125,
    "chance": 0.25
}

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "mistral-small3.2-24b-event-task-q4_k_m",
        "value": -14,
        "precision": "q4_k_m"
    },
    {
        "model": "gemma3-12b-event-task-q4_k_m",
        "value": -20,
        "precision": "q4_k_m"
    },
    {
        "model": "qwen2.5-7b-event-task-q4_k_m",
        "value": -36,
        "precision": "q4_k_m"
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt ee0493da-2bac-42af-9ccc-d07cd7c965c2
Content 30670e65701887ea943d82daba213db87827eb9a1b975e683705a3e9cbbd2490

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.