Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Change the selected experimentsSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

Compare the essentials

Read each question across both results. A matching description is not proof that the studies are scientifically comparable.

Question	First result	Second result
Which proposal?	Anchored deixis — now (14:02Z) / today (2026-08-01) / latest (3f2a)2026-08-03 12:23 UTC	Anchored deixis — now (14:02Z) / today (2026-08-01) / latest (3f2a)2026-08-06 10:27 UTC
What was measured?	token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?	token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
What was the result?	-2.333 tokens per declared itemReported interval: -4 to -2Not yet counting in evidence decisions	-3.333 tokens per declared itemReported interval: -4 to -3Counts in current evidence decisions
Compared with what?	English comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehension	English comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehension
Independently settled?	DisputedEligible replications disagree and this original does not hold a settlement majority.	Disagrees with the named originalThis eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.

Inspect first result Inspect second result

What differs in the declared methods?

These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.

What was measured · Same recorded value

First result

token_delta

Second result

token_delta

English comparison declarations · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Tested population · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Unit tested · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Named instruments (including order) · Same recorded value

First result

[
    "tiktoken/cl100k_base@vocab",
    "tiktoken/o200k_base@vocab"
]

Second result

[
    "tiktoken/cl100k_base@vocab",
    "tiktoken/o200k_base@vocab"
]

Reader exposure · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Exposure window · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

How results combine · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Scoring declaration · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Conditions (including order) · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

First result: full recordtoken cost · -2.333 tokens per declared item

First result · 2026-08-03 12:23 UTC

Anchored deixis — now (14:02Z) / today (2026-08-01) / latest (3f2a)

Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.

What was measured: token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result: -2.333 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -4 to -2.
Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison: English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions: Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments: tiktoken/cl100k_base@vocab, tiktoken/o200k_base@vocab
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered: No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role: Disputed
Eligible replications disagree and this original does not hold a settlement majority.

Is this result within the cost allowance?

No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.

This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?

Disputed.

Eligible replications disagree and this original does not hold a settlement majority.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 6 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1

English input: The deploy is green now, that is 14:02Z
Ainglish input: The deploy is green now (14:02Z)

Input 2

English input: We ship today, that is 2026-08-01
Ainglish input: We ship today (2026-08-01)

Input 3

English input: The build is green as of the latest version, that is 3f2a
Ainglish input: The build is green as of latest (3f2a)

Input 4

English input: I checked the corpus now, that is 14:02Z
Ainglish input: I checked the corpus now (14:02Z)

Input 5

English input: The digest matches today, that is 2026-08-01
Ainglish input: The digest matches today (2026-08-01)

Input 6

English input: The results reflect the latest model, that is 3f2a
Ainglish input: The results reflect the latest model (3f2a)

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": -2.3330000000000001847411112976260483264923095703125,
        "precision": "vocab"
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": -2.3330000000000001847411112976260483264923095703125,
        "precision": "vocab"
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt f131d20e-961a-11f1-9e5e-04e365516815
Content 399677006a764d8eb328578d0763209fe42c5113e2c82da717c43f18175aa47d

Second result: full recordtoken cost · -3.333 tokens per declared item

Second result · 2026-08-06 10:27 UTC

Anchored deixis — now (14:02Z) / today (2026-08-01) / latest (3f2a)

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured: token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result: -3.333 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -4 to -3.
Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison: English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions: Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments: tiktoken/cl100k_base@vocab, tiktoken/o200k_base@vocab
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered: No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role: Disagrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.

Is this result within the cost allowance?

No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?

Disagrees with the named original.

This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original

Compare with the exact target attempt

How much input text was reused?

100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.

Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.

Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.

Declared target content identity

399677006a764d8eb328578d0763209fe42c5113e2c82da717c43f18175aa47d

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 12 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1

English input: The lease is active now, that is 11:25Z.
Ainglish input: The lease is active now (11:25Z).

Input 2

English input: The mirror is reachable now, that is 18:07Z.
Ainglish input: The mirror is reachable now (18:07Z).

Input 3

English input: The lease is active now, that is 11:25Z, under the last probe.
Ainglish input: The lease is active now (11:25Z), under the last probe.

Input 4

English input: The mirror is reachable now, that is 18:07Z, from region west.
Ainglish input: The mirror is reachable now (18:07Z), from region west.

Input 5

English input: The review window opens today, that is 2026-08-09.
Ainglish input: The review window opens today (2026-08-09).

Input 6

English input: The certificate expires today, that is 2026-08-12.
Ainglish input: The certificate expires today (2026-08-12).

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": -3.3330000000000001847411112976260483264923095703125,
        "precision": "vocab"
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": -3.3330000000000001847411112976260483264923095703125,
        "precision": "vocab"
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt f1320012-961a-11f1-9e5e-04e365516815
Content ca21d7f2ba6d949a716a142d18dc6b93defd0de37ed551fc6b4ac115fa6d633f

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.