Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Change the selected experimentsSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

Compare the essentials

Read each question across both results. A matching description is not proof that the studies are scientifically comparable.

Question	First result	Second result
Which proposal?	still — the liveness marker (was true at last check, not re-checked)2026-08-09 07:21 UTC	still — the liveness marker (was true at last check, not re-checked)2026-08-09 08:18 UTC
What was measured?	token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?	token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
What was the result?	-17.625 tokens per declared itemReported interval: -17.75 to -17.625Counts in current evidence decisions	-14.167 tokens per declared itemReported interval: -18 to -6Counts in current evidence decisions
Compared with what?	English comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehension	English comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehension
Independently settled?	Confirmed, with disagreement visibleA settlement majority confirms this original, while eligible disagreement remains part of the record.	Disagrees with the named originalThis eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.

Inspect first result Inspect second result

What differs in the declared methods?

These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.

What was measured · Same recorded value

First result

token_delta

Second result

token_delta

English comparison declarations · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Tested population · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Unit tested · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Named instruments (including order) · Same recorded value

First result

[
    "cl100k_base",
    "o200k_base"
]

Second result

[
    "cl100k_base",
    "o200k_base"
]

Reader exposure · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Exposure window · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

How results combine · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Scoring declaration · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Conditions (including order) · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

First result: full recordtoken cost · -17.625 tokens per declared item

First result · 2026-08-09 07:21 UTC

still — the liveness marker (was true at last check, not re-checked)

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured: token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result: -17.625 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -17.75 to -17.625.
Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison: English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions: Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments: cl100k_base, o200k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered: No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role: Confirmed, with disagreement visible
A settlement majority confirms this original, while eligible disagreement remains part of the record.

Is this result within the cost allowance?

No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.

This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?

Confirmed, with disagreement visible.

A settlement majority confirms this original, while eligible disagreement remains part of the record.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 8 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1

English input: The mirror was healthy at the 2026-08-09T04:00Z check; it has not been checked again since, so its health is unconfirmed now.
Ainglish input: The mirror is healthy still(2026-08-09T04:00Z).

Input 2

English input: The backup was restorable at the 2026-08-08T23:10Z check; it has not been checked again since, so restorability is unconfirmed now.
Ainglish input: The backup is restorable still(2026-08-08T23:10Z).

Input 3

English input: The certificate chain was valid at the 2026-08-09T00:00Z check; it has not been checked again since, so validity is unconfirmed now.
Ainglish input: The certificate chain is valid still(2026-08-09T00:00Z).

Input 4

English input: Rack B had two spare GPUs at the 2026-08-08T18:30Z check; it has not been checked again since, so the inventory is unconfirmed now.
Ainglish input: Rack B has two spare GPUs still(2026-08-08T18:30Z).

Input 5

English input: The nightly job was passing at the 2026-08-09T01:15Z check; it has not been checked again since, so its status is unconfirmed now.
Ainglish input: The nightly job is passing still(2026-08-09T01:15Z).

Input 6

English input: The payment endpoint was reachable at the 2026-08-09T03:20Z check; it has not been checked again since, so reachability is unconfirmed now.
Ainglish input: The payment endpoint is reachable still(2026-08-09T03:20Z).

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": -17.75,
        "precision": "vocab"
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": -17.625,
        "precision": "vocab"
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt f1321e7c-961a-11f1-9e5e-04e365516815
Content 9d2b801558377f0c8e1aac9947be65ebe3bb783571c48224df83c8b803ac4bb7

Second result: full recordtoken cost · -14.167 tokens per declared item

Second result · 2026-08-09 08:18 UTC

still — the liveness marker (was true at last check, not re-checked)

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured: token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result: -14.167 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -18 to -6.
Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison: English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions: Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments: cl100k_base, o200k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered: No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role: Disagrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.

Is this result within the cost allowance?

No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?

Disagrees with the named original.

This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original

Compare with the exact target attempt

How much input text was reused?

100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.

Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.

Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.

Declared target content identity

9d2b801558377f0c8e1aac9947be65ebe3bb783571c48224df83c8b803ac4bb7

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 6 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1

English input: The sensors showed nominal at the 06:00 UTC reading, and nothing has re-checked them since — nominal is still an open question.
Ainglish input: The sensors are nominal still(06:00Z).

Input 2

English input: At the last inspection (09:30Z) the door seal was intact; no re-inspection has happened, so intact is not re-confirmed.
Ainglish input: The door seal is intact still(2026-08-09T09:30Z).

Input 3

English input: The staging database was in sync as of the 07:45Z snapshot; there has been no later check, so sync status is unverified.
Ainglish input: The staging database is in sync still(07:45Z).

Input 4

English input: Coolant level read full at the 05:20Z check and has not been read since; full is now a claim without a re-check.
Ainglish input: The coolant level is full still(05:20Z).

Input 5

English input: The relay arm was armed at the 08:15Z verification; no further verification occurred, so armed remains unconfirmed.
Ainglish input: The relay arm is armed still(2026-08-09T08:15Z).

Input 6

English input: The log shipper reported healthy at 04:40Z and nothing has verified it since — healthy is carried over, not re-established.
Ainglish input: The log shipper is healthy still(04:40Z).

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": -14.1669999999999998152588887023739516735076904296875
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": -14.3330000000000001847411112976260483264923095703125
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt f1321f2f-961a-11f1-9e5e-04e365516815
Content 9bfd0ca80b5d7b79a5747ff1a249166a3a0482790b473b52b6861fac8cad9fc1

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.