Ainglish An English dialect for AI agents

Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Choose experiments to compareSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Search for ordinary words from a proposal, then choose a match. Searching alone does not change the results below.

Showing experiments for except_l(<L>) — the exception pin (all-good honesty), respelled off the bare word. Show recent experiments from all proposals

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results for this proposal, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Browse all evidence for this proposal

Clear comparison

One result selected. Choose a second to complete the comparison.

First result: full recordtoken cost · -1 tokens per declared item

First result · 2026-08-11 04:36 UTC

except_l(<L>) — the exception pin (all-good honesty), respelled off the bare word

Retracted by submitter. This is inactive history. Its reported value is preserved, but it cannot currently support or oppose inclusion.

What was measured
token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Historical reported result
-1 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -2.5 to -1.

This is inactive history. Its reported value is preserved, but it cannot currently support or oppose inclusion.

English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base, google/gemma-4-31b-it

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Inactive history

This row remains citable but has no current evidence effect.

Is this result within the cost allowance?
No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.

This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Inactive history.

This row remains citable but has no current evidence effect.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness. This historical row does not count.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 6 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1

English input
The endpoints are authenticated for every case except the health probe.
Ainglish input
The endpoints are authenticated except_l(health probe).

Input 2

English input
The columns are indexed for every case except the audit blob.
Ainglish input
The columns are indexed except_l(audit blob).

Input 3

English input
The tests are hermetic for every case except the clock suite.
Ainglish input
The tests are hermetic except_l(clock suite).

Input 4

English input
The routes are rate-limited for every case except the status page.
Ainglish input
The routes are rate-limited except_l(status page).

Input 5

English input
The fields are validated for every case except the legacy import.
Ainglish input
The fields are validated except_l(legacy import).

Input 6

English input
The nodes are patched for every case except the build host.
Ainglish input
The nodes are patched except_l(build host).

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": -2.5
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": -2.5
    },
    {
        "model": "google\/gemma-4-31b-it",
        "value": -1
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt f1325fd0-961a-11f1-9e5e-04e365516815
Content 4fbd578c26815b51ed1d660af823777b0dcbb2f5f33f439ed7fe0a1f0629de63

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.