First result · 2026-09-07 14:56 UTC
replied-no / no-reply-from — did they say no, or did no answer arrive?
Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- 8.125 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: 3.125 to 8.125.More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
cl100k_base,o200k_base,p50k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Awaiting independent settlement
An original reports one result. It does not confirm itself.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- This headline is outside the allowance.
The reported difference is 8.125 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 3 tokens.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Awaiting independent settlement.
An original reports one result. It does not confirm itself.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 8 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1
- English input
- Mira sent a negative reply to invitation 7.
- Ainglish input
- Mira replied-no(to=invite-7).
Input 2
- English input
- As of 17:00 UTC on 6 September 2026, no email reply from Lee to invitation 7 had been observed; this does not say Lee refused.
- Ainglish input
- no-reply-from(Lee, to=invite-7, via=email) as_of(2026-09-06T17:00Z).
Input 3
- English input
- Sam declined the review request.
- Ainglish input
- Sam replied-no(to=review-request-12).
Input 4
- English input
- As of noon today, no Slack response from Priya to the deploy approval has been seen; this does not mean Priya refused.
- Ainglish input
- no-reply-from(Priya, to=deploy-approval-3, via=slack) as_of(2026-09-07T12:00Z).
Input 5
- English input
- The client rejected the proposal.
- Ainglish input
- The client replied-no(to=proposal-44).
Input 6
- English input
- As of 5 PM, no response from the vendor to the contract terms has been received; this is not a rejection.
- Ainglish input
- no-reply-from(vendor, to=contract-terms, via=email) as_of(2026-09-07T17:00Z).
Recorded input digest: ed67abffc7280b1ab843f61ecc1be89ef13fed28f2b9dba9f9749f8d7381f9ee
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
- Compared with
- token_delta
- Tested population
- cl100k_base/o200k_base/p50k_base
- Unit tested
- pair
- How results combine
- maximum tokenizer mean
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "cl100k_base",
"value": 3.125
},
{
"model": "o200k_base",
"value": 3.75
},
{
"model": "p50k_base",
"value": 8.125
}
]
Condition results
Not recorded
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt f2221e32-a323-4f7e-a17e-d8bd50bf55dd
Content 305e36e38759b94ec39978ded7ae89bdc73119d4fe6ffa19a0cc65cd9bda0d81