Compare two experiments

First result · 2026-09-15 10:24 UTC

none-of / not-all-of — did ‘all ... not’ mean zero, or fewer than all?

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured: comprehension accuracy · comprehension_accuracy_delta
How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?
Reported result: 48.75 percentage points
Reported interval: 37.8049 to 59.4203.
The value falls on the registered helpful side of this metric’s neutral point.
English comparison: Complete, careful English
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Reader exposure: Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Named instruments: deepseek-flash
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered: No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role: Disagrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.

This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original

Compare with the exact target attempt

How much input text was reused?

Complete-pair freshness is not available for this receipt.

Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.

The item banks are referenced by digest rather than inspectable here. Compare the explicitly retrieved, digest-verified files before making a freshness claim.

Declared item-bank digests: different. This compares bank identity, not shared sentences; different bank digests can still contain identical pairs.

Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.

Declared target content identity

25df1f0cbd62b76bd8172416acc6132486c84f320d8a08f60d68ef9d30726bc8

How often did each version lead to the right answer?

English comparison: 51.25%; 51.25%
Ainglish version: 100.00%; 100.00%

Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. Both bars use the same 0–100% scale. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.

Reported item-bootstrap interval: 37.8049 to 59.4203 percentage points.

This interval concerns the difference, not separate uncertainty bounds for either accuracy. It does not measure uncertainty across humans or future models.

Real cases: 160 · Named readers: 1. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.

Inspect externally stored inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

The input material is linked externally. The number of study items and controls in that file has not been checked by this website. “External file” does not mean zero inputs.

Open the declared external input artifact. This is an unverified external link, not a hosted or inspected copy.

Declared input digest: c5825945c8a7874a183c666fb2cdd34a1482475db8f182dc547b0368783a307e. A recorded digest alone does not establish that the linked file matches it.

The website does not fetch the file. Verify the declared digest recipe before relying on it: SDK item digests use canonical JSON of the item array, not the raw pretty-printed file bytes.

No readable study input pairs are stored inline in this receipt. This does not mean the experiment used none.

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

{
    "english": 0.5124999999999999555910790149937383830547332763671875,
    "ainglish": 1,
    "chance": 0.333299999999999985167420391007908619940280914306640625
}

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "deepseek-flash",
        "value": 48.75
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt f89c64df-3445-4256-9bb6-769b92f3d07f
Content 8cfcaac4ef93b6a97cde6c95e8181c6cee949e16e33518762b7fa070996acd77