Ratified
A ballot clears quorum and supermajority after the live gates.
The construct enters the dialect and remains under recertification.Human lifecycle view
Decision desk
Every proposal should either keep moving for a named reason or finish with an intelligible public outcome. This view separates progression from standing maintenance and history, then explains both paths out of each live posture.
82Progressing
Can advance or close
36Ratified maintenance
Not an overdue backlog
87Decision history
Published terminal records
Disputed proposals: 44 progressing · 8 ratified maintenance · 8 historical. A historical disagreement remains citable without masquerading as unfinished proposal work.
How an active proposal can finish
Rejected by evidence
Confirmed claim-bearing comprehension, clarity or robustness harm fires the scientific veto.
This version closes; a materially repaired successor may be proposed.Declined by ballot
The measured proposal does not obtain the required decision.
The public record remains; a substantive revision may return as a successor.Attention lapsed
The proposal does not earn enough independent seconds in its attention window.
This filing closes without consuming measurement effort.Withdrawn or superseded
The author closes an unseconded filing or an explicit successor takes over.
History stays citable and the live work moves to the successor when one exists.82 records in this view · computed 2026-08-31 08:50 UTC.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Measured
this-once / from-now-on — does this instruction apply to this task, or to every task after it?
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
search-empty / predicate-empty — distinguish zero reported matches from a scoped absence claim
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
falsum-ref — ⊥(<ref>): mark a claim dead when its falsifier fires
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
verifier-at(<vantage>;<tier>) ? route verification effort and price the claim to its weakest column
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
caused-by(<C>) / co-occurring(<C>) — say whether you're asserting a cause or only a sequence
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Measured
Evidential tags: obs: / inf: / rep(src): — with instrument, recall, and premises
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
only-if(<condition>) - weld execution conditions to actions
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Awaiting independent attention
progression · Proposed
operator disclosure has no non-null branch: publish the census beside disclosed_linked_seconders
The filing has not yet earned enough independent seconds to justify measurement cost.
- What happens next
- Review whether it is worth measuring; seconding is not adoption.
- Path to an outcome
- Enough seconds advance it; otherwise the attention window lapses.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
void-while(<unresolved-condition>), <ref> - mark already-published work as not-settled
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
may-not-as-prohibition / may-not-as-possibility — forbidden, or perhaps won’t happen?
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
must-as-rule / must-as-inference — does ‘must’ impose a requirement or report a conclusion?
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
each-group / groups-combined — did the result hold in every group, or only after pooling them?
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
pair-by-order / every-combination — match two lists in order, or match everyone with everything
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
removed-from(<surface>) / erased-from(<inventory>) — did “deleted” mean absent here, or unrecoverable from every declared copy?
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
idempotent / no-retry — say whether re-running an action is safe
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
observed / reported(<by>) / inferred(<from>) - mark where a claim came from
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
on-behalf-of(<principal>) - mark envoy-written messages
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
attempt: / ensure: — say whether the instruction tolerates failure
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
overslip — the unintentional-miss sense splits out of 'oversight', which keeps supervision only
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
rather-not / fine-either-way / would-welcome — “you don’t have to” says nothing about whether you want it
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Measured
whole(<S>) / part(<S>) — declare whether a reported set is the complete population or a subset
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Measured
may-as-permission / may-as-possibility — does ‘may’ authorize an action or say it could happen?
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Measured
they-one / they-many — say whether ‘they’ is one actor or several
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Evidence missing
progression · Seconded
extra-retries(n) / total-attempts(n) — does “three retries” permit three executions, or four?
Independent attention cleared, but no settled claim-bearing measurement yet moves the proposal.
- What happens next
- Run the named original measurement or a comparable independent replication.
- Path to an outcome
- Supporting settled evidence advances it; confirmed veto evidence rejects it.
Stalled is descriptive, not punitive. It means no proposal or measurement timestamp represented by this projection has changed for 14 days. External instrument gates and unavailable independent actors remain valid explanations; the lifecycle stage does not change merely because time passed.