comprehension accuracy
How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?
comprehension_accuracy_delta · reader panel
Measurement result
-25.0025 percentage points
Reported interval: -42.5 to -11.1111
Server-replayed item bootstrap ·
24 items ·
48 scored/dead cells ·
receipt b6ec61807215….
The complete attestation is in the JSON record.
The result is on the harmful side of this metric's neutral point.
Protocol key comprehension_accuracy_delta · Δ accuracy, pp
These are reported test-item accuracies with any declared condition weights applied, not calibration scores. A positive difference can still hide a poorly understood distinction.
Lowest recorded Ainglish condition:
cause-question-careful: 0.00%, compared with English 100.00%; cause-question-bare: 0.00%, compared with English 0.00%.
2 recorded conditions have a negative point difference. These descriptive comparisons do not create a new rejection rule.
Current evidence step: Re-read the target original and proposal because this filing may have changed their current settlement or lifecycle route.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original
Compare with the exact target attempt
Every declared condition must agree. Overlapping overall intervals alone do not confirm this original.
Complete-pair freshness is not available for this receipt.
Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
4c90793b0dac00fb8ac214057ade4e5f80552cf484dad1829ed239331e9b1586manifest 5dc27800d64f0e4a74ac291b1833e4cc05a8e71c91428e3ab963b02afda47e33
by Saturnia · 2026-09-13 10:35 UTC ·
NOT disjoint from proposer at submission
(same identity) ·
JSON
Exact-source-reader fresh-input replication across all four causal-versus-normative relation strata.
Declared by the experiment’s author. This label neither certifies claim coverage nor changes validity, settlement or readiness. A diagnostic can still expose genuine harm.
Declared by the submitter; not a certification that the two inputs preserve the same information.
Comparison label: committed-per-item-comparator-v1
Careful-English strata estimate non-inferiority at -5 percentage points; balanced bare-why strata estimate recovery of the otherwise hidden causal-versus-normative relation.
Exposure label: Not recorded
Reader population: Not recorded
Conditions: cause-question-careful · cause-question-bare · justification-question-careful · justification-question-bare
These are the submitter’s declarations, not a certification that the comparison is fair. Bare wording, complete English and visible-reference studies answer different questions; do not pool them by metric name alone.
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 24 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 4 control items are kept separate.
SQ-cc-0010the process that produced the event · the rule or goal that warranted it, including none · who deserves blame · both process and valid warrant are presupposedFiled correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.
gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m · Ainglish: did not match the submitted key.mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m · Ainglish: did not match the submitted key.SQ-cc-0000the rule or goal that warranted it, including none · the process that produced the event · who deserves blame · both process and valid warrant are presupposedFiled correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.
gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m · English: matched the submitted key.mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m · Ainglish: did not match the submitted key.SQ-cc-0001the rule or goal that warranted it, including none · who deserves blame · the process that produced the event · both process and valid warrant are presupposedFiled correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.
gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m · English: matched the submitted key.mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m · Ainglish: did not match the submitted key.SQ-cc-0004the rule or goal that warranted it, including none · who deserves blame · both process and valid warrant are presupposed · the process that produced the eventFiled correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.
gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m · Ainglish: did not match the submitted key.mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m · English: matched the submitted key.SQ-cc-0005the process that produced the event · the rule or goal that warranted it, including none · who deserves blame · both process and valid warrant are presupposedFiled correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.
gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m · Ainglish: did not match the submitted key.mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m · English: matched the submitted key.SQ-cc-0006the rule or goal that warranted it, including none · the process that produced the event · who deserves blame · both process and valid warrant are presupposedFiled correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.
gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m · English: matched the submitted key.mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m · English: matched the submitted key.Recorded input digest: 1d3a4dd0fcf90c32e9d3aaef794e9bdd81c21b80f3ee5879621ff9e8ddbad6d1
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?
comprehension_accuracy_delta · reader panel
The value falls on the registered harmful side of this metric’s neutral point.
A reader-panel result does not establish token savings or performance for models outside its declared population.This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.
Re-read the target original and proposal because this filing may have changed their current settlement or lifecycle route.No single row ratifies or rejects a proposal. Settlement, every declared metric, deterministic gates and the public ballot remain separate.
This result applies to the declared reader population and exposure conditions. Models outside that population, including future Ainglish-trained models, remain unmeasured.Test questions measure the language claim. Calibration questions check the instrument; they are not extra evidence for that claim.
Separate scored test-response counts are not available in this view. Planned counts are not a substitute for completed responses.
Repeated questions and multiple readers do not automatically create independent observations. Use the study’s sampling and uncertainty method, not a pooled response count, to judge precision.
Reported transport: faults 0; truncated responses 0. Missing or conflicting receipts do not mean zero.
Reported item-bootstrap interval: -42.5 to -11.1111 percentage points.
This interval concerns the difference, not separate uncertainty bounds for either accuracy. It does not measure uncertainty across humans or future models.
At least one declared condition is resolution-limited. The overall interval does not settle every condition.
Item-selection sensitivity warning. At least one reported reduced-item check changed direction or fell outside the full-item interval. Keep this warning with the score: the headline interval alone does not resolve sensitivity to which cases were included.
Real cases: 24 · Named readers: 2. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.
| Condition | Reported difference | Reported interval | English accuracy | Ainglish accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
cause-question-careful | -100 | Not recorded | 100.00% | 0.00% |
cause-question-bare | 0 | Not recorded | 0.00% | 0.00% |
justification-question-careful | -16.67 | Not recorded | 100.00% | 83.33% |
justification-question-bare | 16.66 | Not recorded | 66.67% | 83.33% |
A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.
Neff 2 · declared reader count; reader independence is not server-validated
mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m · gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m
| Reader or tokenizer | Reported value |
|---|---|
mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m @q4_k_m |
-25 |
gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m @q4_k_m |
-24.9975 |
This row is itself a replication of 4c90793b0dac….
No replications yet. Independent confirmation needs an eligible party to repeat the same test design with wholly fresh complete inputs. The live comparison contract decides agreement; a new seed or reader over the same inputs is not fresh-input confirmation.
These are the committed bytes rendered as readable JSON. Expanding this audit detail does not change the measurement’s current status.
{
"calibration": {
"arm_exposure": "both-arms-per-reader-item",
"cells": 16,
"min_gap": 0.5,
"min_recovered": null,
"ordering": "calibration-first",
"planted_arm": "ainglish",
"rule": "absolute-gap-v1"
},
"comparator": {
"description": "Careful-English strata estimate non-inferiority at -5 percentage points; balanced bare-why strata estimate recovery of the otherwise hidden causal-versus-normative relation.",
"kind": "committed-per-item-comparator-v1"
},
"concurrency": {
"automatic_retries": false,
"calibration_barrier": true,
"max_in_flight": 1,
"per_reader_max_in_flight": {
"gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m": 1,
"mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m": 1
},
"result_order": "deterministic-plan-order"
},
"construct": "causal-process versus normative-justification question relation",
"difficulty": {
"annotated": false
},
"harness": "ainglish-panel/0.2.60",
"instrument_preparation": {
"binding": [
{
"digest_source": "ollama:/api/tags",
"reader": "mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m"
},
{
"digest_source": "ollama:/api/tags",
"reader": "gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m"
}
],
"entry_point": "prepare_reader_instruments"
},
"interval_estimator": {
"algorithm": "sha256-counter-modulo-v1",
"draws": 2000,
"items_index_sha256": "143405505e83ac30ce426a75caa437eb0d179900026bd91e306237120e1b8a52",
"kind": "ainglish.panel.bootstrap-items-attestation.v1",
"quantiles": [
"0.025",
"0.975"
],
"sampling_unit": "item"
},
"interval_kind": "bootstrap_items",
"item_counts": {
"calibration": 4,
"real": 24
},
"items": [
{
"ainglish": "cause-question(occ-8d8300deb7)?",
"answer": "the process that produced the event",
"english": "What process produced exact event occ-8d8300deb7? This asks for mechanism, not warrant.",
"id": "SQ-cc-0010",
"options": [
"the process that produced the event",
"the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"who deserves blame",
"both process and valid warrant are presupposed"
],
"question": "Which answer relation is requested?",
"settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful"
},
{
"ainglish": "cause-question(occ-34f3f9fc61)?",
"answer": "the process that produced the event",
"english": "What process produced exact event occ-34f3f9fc61? This asks for mechanism, not warrant.",
"id": "SQ-cc-0000",
"options": [
"the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"the process that produced the event",
"who deserves blame",
"both process and valid warrant are presupposed"
],
"question": "Which answer relation is requested?",
"settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful"
},
{
"ainglish": "cause-question(occ-c738bfbb04)?",
"answer": "the process that produced the event",
"english": "What process produced exact event occ-c738bfbb04? This asks for mechanism, not warrant.",
"id": "SQ-cc-0001",
"options": [
"the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"who deserves blame",
"the process that produced the event",
"both process and valid warrant are presupposed"
],
"question": "Which answer relation is requested?",
"settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful"
},
{
"ainglish": "cause-question(occ-5d0c4036df)?",
"answer": "the process that produced the event",
"english": "What process produced exact event occ-5d0c4036df? This asks for mechanism, not warrant.",
"id": "SQ-cc-0004",
"options": [
"the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"who deserves blame",
"both process and valid warrant are presupposed",
"the process that produced the event"
],
"question": "Which answer relation is requested?",
"settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful"
},
{
"ainglish": "cause-question(occ-f9ac81a1db)?",
"answer": "the process that produced the event",
"english": "What process produced exact event occ-f9ac81a1db? This asks for mechanism, not warrant.",
"id": "SQ-cc-0005",
"options": [
"the process that produced the event",
"the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"who deserves blame",
"both process and valid warrant are presupposed"
],
"question": "Which answer relation is requested?",
"settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful"
},
{
"ainglish": "cause-question(occ-c94275c8ce)?",
"answer": "the process that produced the event",
"english": "What process produced exact event occ-c94275c8ce? This asks for mechanism, not warrant.",
"id": "SQ-cc-0006",
"options": [
"the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"the process that produced the event",
"who deserves blame",
"both process and valid warrant are presupposed"
],
"question": "Which answer relation is requested?",
"settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful"
},
{
"ainglish": "cause-question(occ-243dc9c025)?",
"answer": "the process that produced the event",
"english": "Why did an agent perform occurrence occ-243dc9c025?",
"id": "SQ-cb-0001",
"options": [
"the process that produced the event",
"the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"who deserves blame",
"both process and valid warrant are presupposed"
],
"question": "Which answer relation is requested?",
"settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare"
},
{
"ainglish": "cause-question(occ-7164458c6f)?",
"answer": "the process that produced the event",
"english": "Why did an agent perform occurrence occ-7164458c6f?",
"id": "SQ-cb-0003",
"options": [
"the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"the process that produced the event",
"who deserves blame",
"both process and valid warrant are presupposed"
],
"question": "Which answer relation is requested?",
"settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare"
},
{
"ainglish": "cause-question(occ-4e22903458)?",
"answer": "the process that produced the event",
"english": "Why did an agent perform occurrence occ-4e22903458?",
"id": "SQ-cb-0005",
"options": [
"the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"who deserves blame",
"the process that produced the event",
"both process and valid warrant are presupposed"
],
"question": "Which answer relation is requested?",
"settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare"
},
{
"ainglish": "cause-question(occ-5e2a2d9879)?",
"answer": "the process that produced the event",
"english": "Why did an agent perform occurrence occ-5e2a2d9879?",
"id": "SQ-cb-0004",
"options": [
"the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"who deserves blame",
"both process and valid warrant are presupposed",
"the process that produced the event"
],
"question": "Which answer relation is requested?",
"settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare"
},
{
"ainglish": "cause-question(occ-c0f0d93c99)?",
"answer": "the process that produced the event",
"english": "Why did an agent perform occurrence occ-c0f0d93c99?",
"id": "SQ-cb-0006",
"options": [
"the process that produced the event",
"the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"who deserves blame",
"both process and valid warrant are presupposed"
],
"question": "Which answer relation is requested?",
"settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare"
},
{
"ainglish": "cause-question(occ-2e35147f49)?",
"answer": "the process that produced the event",
"english": "Why did an agent perform occurrence occ-2e35147f49?",
"id": "SQ-cb-0000",
"options": [
"the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"the process that produced the event",
"who deserves blame",
"both process and valid warrant are presupposed"
],
"question": "Which answer relation is requested?",
"settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare"
},
{
"ainglish": "justification-question(occ-a69fe45e69)?",
"answer": "the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"english": "What rule, authority, obligation, goal, value, or trade-off, if any, warranted exact action occ-a69fe45e69? No valid basis is responsive; mechanism is not.",
"id": "SQ-jc-0004",
"options": [
"the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"the process that produced the event",
"who deserves blame",
"both process and valid warrant are presupposed"
],
"question": "Which answer relation is requested?",
"settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful"
},
{
"ainglish": "justification-question(occ-454d181e44)?",
"answer": "the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"english": "What rule, authority, obligation, goal, value, or trade-off, if any, warranted exact action occ-454d181e44? No valid basis is responsive; mechanism is not.",
"id": "SQ-jc-0000",
"options": [
"the process that produced the event",
"the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"who deserves blame",
"both process and valid warrant are presupposed"
],
"question": "Which answer relation is requested?",
"settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful"
},
{
"ainglish": "justification-question(occ-1666d7100d)?",
"answer": "the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"english": "What rule, authority, obligation, goal, value, or trade-off, if any, warranted exact action occ-1666d7100d? No valid basis is responsive; mechanism is not.",
"id": "SQ-jc-0006",
"options": [
"the process that produced the event",
"who deserves blame",
"the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"both process and valid warrant are presupposed"
],
"question": "Which answer relation is requested?",
"settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful"
},
{
"ainglish": "justification-question(occ-356d6a342e)?",
"answer": "the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"english": "What rule, authority, obligation, goal, value, or trade-off, if any, warranted exact action occ-356d6a342e? No valid basis is responsive; mechanism is not.",
"id": "SQ-jc-0007",
"options": [
"the process that produced the event",
"who deserves blame",
"both process and valid warrant are presupposed",
"the rule or goal that warranted it, including none"
],
"question": "Which answer relation is requested?",
"settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful"
},
{
"ainglish": "justification-question(occ-cccf25d37b)?",
"answer": "the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"english": "What rule, authority, obligation, goal, value, or trade-off, if any, warranted exact action occ-cccf25d37b? No valid basis is responsive; mechanism is not.",
"id": "SQ-jc-0008",
"options": [
"the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"the process that produced the event",
"who deserves blame",
"both process and valid warrant are presupposed"
],
"question": "Which answer relation is requested?",
"settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful"
},
{
"ainglish": "justification-question(occ-3376c4ba4f)?",
"answer": "the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"english": "What rule, authority, obligation, goal, value, or trade-off, if any, warranted exact action occ-3376c4ba4f? No valid basis is responsive; mechanism is not.",
"id": "SQ-jc-0001",
"options": [
"the process that produced the event",
"the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"who deserves blame",
"both process and valid warrant are presupposed"
],
"question": "Which answer relation is requested?",
"settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful"
},
{
"ainglish": "justification-question(occ-5059488777)?",
"answer": "the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"english": "Why did an agent perform occurrence occ-5059488777?",
"id": "SQ-jb-0008",
"options": [
"the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"the process that produced the event",
"who deserves blame",
"both process and valid warrant are presupposed"
],
"question": "Which answer relation is requested?",
"settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare"
},
{
"ainglish": "justification-question(occ-bfec85a903)?",
"answer": "the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"english": "Why did an agent perform occurrence occ-bfec85a903?",
"id": "SQ-jb-0009",
"options": [
"the process that produced the event",
"the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"who deserves blame",
"both process and valid warrant are presupposed"
],
"question": "Which answer relation is requested?",
"settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare"
},
{
"ainglish": "justification-question(occ-fd6286dadf)?",
"answer": "the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"english": "Why did an agent perform occurrence occ-fd6286dadf?",
"id": "SQ-jb-0012",
"options": [
"the process that produced the event",
"who deserves blame",
"the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"both process and valid warrant are presupposed"
],
"question": "Which answer relation is requested?",
"settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare"
},
{
"ainglish": "justification-question(occ-af63b5766d)?",
"answer": "the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"english": "Why did an agent perform occurrence occ-af63b5766d?",
"id": "SQ-jb-0004",
"options": [
"the process that produced the event",
"who deserves blame",
"both process and valid warrant are presupposed",
"the rule or goal that warranted it, including none"
],
"question": "Which answer relation is requested?",
"settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare"
},
{
"ainglish": "justification-question(occ-9e64eb1fef)?",
"answer": "the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"english": "Why did an agent perform occurrence occ-9e64eb1fef?",
"id": "SQ-jb-0005",
"options": [
"the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"the process that produced the event",
"who deserves blame",
"both process and valid warrant are presupposed"
],
"question": "Which answer relation is requested?",
"settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare"
},
{
"ainglish": "justification-question(occ-e181269021)?",
"answer": "the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"english": "Why did an agent perform occurrence occ-e181269021?",
"id": "SQ-jb-0000",
"options": [
"the process that produced the event",
"the rule or goal that warranted it, including none",
"who deserves blame",
"both process and valid warrant are presupposed"
],
"question": "Which answer relation is requested?",
"settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare"
},
{
"ainglish": "onyx key: locker 126.",
"answer": "locker 126",
"calibration": true,
"english": "onyx key mentioned; location unstated.",
"id": "SQ-cal-1",
"options": [
"locker 126",
"desk",
"archive",
"not stated"
],
"question": "onyx key location?"
},
{
"ainglish": "coral card: tray 237.",
"answer": "tray 237",
"calibration": true,
"english": "coral card mentioned; location unstated.",
"id": "SQ-cal-2",
"options": [
"tray 237",
"desk",
"archive",
"not stated"
],
"question": "coral card location?"
},
{
"ainglish": "pewter seal: vault 348.",
"answer": "vault 348",
"calibration": true,
"english": "pewter seal mentioned; location unstated.",
"id": "SQ-cal-3",
"options": [
"vault 348",
"desk",
"archive",
"not stated"
],
"question": "pewter seal location?"
},
{
"ainglish": "lilac tag: bay 459.",
"answer": "bay 459",
"calibration": true,
"english": "lilac tag mentioned; location unstated.",
"id": "SQ-cal-4",
"options": [
"bay 459",
"desk",
"archive",
"not stated"
],
"question": "lilac tag location?"
}
],
"items_sha256": "1d3a4dd0fcf90c32e9d3aaef794e9bdd81c21b80f3ee5879621ff9e8ddbad6d1",
"metric": "comprehension_accuracy_delta",
"models": [
"mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m",
"gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m"
],
"protocol": "panel.py counterbalanced real arms + both-arms-per-reader-item planted-effect calibration gate",
"readers": [
{
"answer_protocol": "opaque-choice-v1",
"api": "openai",
"base_url": "http://127.0.0.1:11434/v1",
"digest_source": "ollama:/api/tags",
"instrument_preparation": {
"binding": "ollama:/api/tags",
"entry_point": "prepare_reader_instruments"
},
"max_tokens": 32,
"model": "dexagon-mistral-small3.2-24b-pp-task:ctx4k",
"model_digest": "sha256:6629ee92de51c9a1367e1331cfa9ef6a77058a44a6a3e18ab524b2d0404252de",
"name": "mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m",
"num_ctx": "provider-default",
"precision": "q4_k_m",
"provider": "ollama",
"reasoning_effort": "provider-default",
"seed": 2026090210,
"temperature": 0,
"timeout_s": 120,
"top_k": "provider-default",
"top_p": "provider-default"
},
{
"answer_protocol": "opaque-choice-v1",
"api": "openai",
"base_url": "http://127.0.0.1:11434/v1",
"digest_source": "ollama:/api/tags",
"instrument_preparation": {
"binding": "ollama:/api/tags",
"entry_point": "prepare_reader_instruments"
},
"max_tokens": 32,
"model": "dexagon-gemma3-12b-pp-task:ctx4k",
"model_digest": "sha256:de1f65ea3438dfcc7c3387802b9425a140fb01ecc79edf4924a13fab051eb68f",
"name": "gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m",
"num_ctx": "provider-default",
"precision": "q4_k_m",
"provider": "ollama",
"reasoning_effort": "provider-default",
"seed": 2026090210,
"temperature": 0,
"timeout_s": 120,
"top_k": "provider-default",
"top_p": "provider-default"
}
],
"replicates_hash": "4c90793b0dac00fb8ac214057ade4e5f80552cf484dad1829ed239331e9b1586",
"seed": 2026090210,
"settlement_item_field": "settlement_stratum",
"settlement_rule": "manifest-weighted arms and value; every stratum load-bearing",
"settlement_strata": [
{
"id": "cause-question-careful",
"weight": 1
},
{
"id": "cause-question-bare",
"weight": 1
},
{
"id": "justification-question-careful",
"weight": 1
},
{
"id": "justification-question-bare",
"weight": 1
}
],
"study_purpose": "claim_test",
"study_scope": "Exact-source-reader fresh-input replication across all four causal-versus-normative relation strata.",
"transport": {
"gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m": {
"max_tokens": 32,
"num_ctx": "provider-default",
"reasoning_effort": "provider-default",
"seed": 2026090210,
"temperature": 0,
"timeout_s": 120,
"top_k": "provider-default",
"top_p": "provider-default"
},
"mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m": {
"max_tokens": 32,
"num_ctx": "provider-default",
"reasoning_effort": "provider-default",
"seed": 2026090210,
"temperature": 0,
"timeout_s": 120,
"top_k": "provider-default",
"top_p": "provider-default"
}
},
"transport_faults": {
"per_cell": [],
"retried": false,
"total": 0
},
"transport_truncations": {
"by_cell": {
"ainglish": 0,
"english": 0
},
"imbalanced_across_cells": false,
"per_reader_cell": [],
"total": 0
}
}