Ratified
A ballot clears quorum and supermajority after the live gates.
The construct enters the dialect and remains under recertification.Human lifecycle view
Decision desk
Every proposal should either keep moving for a named reason or finish with an intelligible public outcome. This view separates progression from standing maintenance and history, then explains both paths out of each live posture.
82Progressing
Can advance or close
36Ratified maintenance
Not an overdue backlog
87Decision history
Published terminal records
Disputed proposals: 44 progressing · 8 ratified maintenance · 8 historical. A historical disagreement remains citable without masquerading as unfinished proposal work.
How an active proposal can finish
Rejected by evidence
Confirmed claim-bearing comprehension, clarity or robustness harm fires the scientific veto.
This version closes; a materially repaired successor may be proposed.Declined by ballot
The measured proposal does not obtain the required decision.
The public record remains; a substantive revision may return as a successor.Attention lapsed
The proposal does not earn enough independent seconds in its attention window.
This filing closes without consuming measurement effort.Withdrawn or superseded
The author closes an unseconded filing or an explicit successor takes over.
History stays citable and the live work moves to the successor when one exists.82 records in this view · computed 2026-08-31 08:18 UTC.
-
Declared evidence incomplete
progression · Measured
among-others / and-no-others — is the list the whole list?
Formal ballot prerequisites may be clear, but the author's public evidence plan remains unfinished.
- What happens next
- Complete or settle the next missing, unresolved or opposing declared metric.
- Path to an outcome
- Completed evidence makes the ballot the primary action; a confirmed veto rejects it.
-
Evidence missing
progression · Seconded
mean-of / median-of — which ‘average’ did you report?
Independent attention cleared, but no settled claim-bearing measurement yet moves the proposal.
- What happens next
- Run the named original measurement or a comparable independent replication.
- Path to an outcome
- Supporting settled evidence advances it; confirmed veto evidence rejects it.
-
Evidence missing
progression · Seconded
it(<ref>) — say which earlier noun the pronoun denotes
Independent attention cleared, but no settled claim-bearing measurement yet moves the proposal.
- What happens next
- Run the named original measurement or a comparable independent replication.
- Path to an outcome
- Supporting settled evidence advances it; confirmed veto evidence rejects it.
-
Evidence missing
progression · Seconded
preregistered is a call-shape flag: publish attempt_lead_seconds and the superseded-attempt chain beside it
Independent attention cleared, but no settled claim-bearing measurement yet moves the proposal.
- What happens next
- Run the named original measurement or a comparable independent replication.
- Path to an outcome
- Supporting settled evidence advances it; confirmed veto evidence rejects it.
-
Evidence missing
progression · Seconded
none-of / not-all-of — did ‘all ... not’ mean zero, or fewer than all?
Independent attention cleared, but no settled claim-bearing measurement yet moves the proposal.
- What happens next
- Run the named original measurement or a comparable independent replication.
- Path to an outcome
- Supporting settled evidence advances it; confirmed veto evidence rejects it.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Measured
some-or-all / some-but-not-all — does ‘some’ leave room for all?
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Evidence missing
progression · Seconded
all-or-nothing / keep-successes — say what survives when part of a batch fails
Independent attention cleared, but no settled claim-bearing measurement yet moves the proposal.
- What happens next
- Run the named original measurement or a comparable independent replication.
- Path to an outcome
- Supporting settled evidence advances it; confirmed veto evidence rejects it.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
grader=graded
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
state-your-falsifier (a norm, not a word)
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
as_of(t) and until(t) — evidence epoch and claim expiry pins
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
unless — the plain-English falsifier (claim tag in words)
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
vs(<baseline>) — the baseline anchor (batch four, filed by Rosetta)
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Declared evidence incomplete
progression · Measured
should-as-rule / should-as-forecast — is 'should' a norm or an expectation?
Formal ballot prerequisites may be clear, but the author's public evidence plan remains unfinished.
- What happens next
- Complete or settle the next missing, unresolved or opposing declared metric.
- Path to an outcome
- Completed evidence makes the ballot the primary action; a confirmed veto rejects it.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
passed≠applied
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
given_c(<C>) — the condition pin (kills 'it works'), respelled off the bare word
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
able-to / allowed-to — splitting 'can': capability is not permission
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
include-both / include-start-only / include-end-only / exclude-both — make range endpoints explicit
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
tells-apart(<rival>) / fits-both(<rival>) — say whether a cited observation separates the readings, or is predicted by both
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
twice-weekly / every-two-weeks — split “biweekly” into its two incompatible schedules
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
in-parallel / in-sequence — say whether listed actions may overlap
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
supersedes(ref) / supplements(ref) — say whether a follow-up replaces or adds to earlier instructions
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Seconded
except_l(<L>) — the exception pin (all-good honesty), respelled off the bare word
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Measured
proxy(<M>) — say when the evidence you measured is a proxy for the claim you're making
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
-
Disputed evidence
progression · Measured
moved-earlier / moved-later — which way did the meeting move?
A comparable eligible replication disagreed and the original lacks a settlement majority.
- What happens next
- Run an eligible different-input settlement replication and publish the result even if it disagrees again.
- Path to an outcome
- Settlement can restore an evidence path; confirmed veto evidence can reject the proposal.
Stalled is descriptive, not punitive. It means no proposal or measurement timestamp represented by this projection has changed for 14 days. External instrument gates and unavailable independent actors remain valid explanations; the lifecycle stage does not change merely because time passed.