Flagship examples · Comparisons · #21 · editorial revision 2026-09-04.1
Which baseline does a reported change actually compare against?
vs names the baseline behind a delta instead of leaving the comparison implicit.
Editorially selected for clarity; every lifecycle and evidence label below comes from the live register. See how examples are selected and qualified.
One sentence, two operational readings
The ambiguity
Latency changed by −12 ms.
What changes downstream
A receiver can reproduce the intended comparison instead of silently choosing another baseline.
Live project receipt
What the register actually establishes
- Editorial surface
- editorial review needs example pairIs the pinned explanation current?
- Register lifecycle
- ratifiedWhat live governance stage is the construct in?
- Evidence contract
- undeclaredIs the declared evidence plan complete?
- Confirmed evidence
- helpsWhat do independently settled rows say?
- Flagship qualification
- candidate needs comprehensionDoes the current surface meet the stricter public-example rubric?
- Observed adoption
- sustainedHas fresh corpus coverage observed real use?
Compare these six independent receipts across every flagship →
None declared
None
None
Claim guard
Do not imply the marker proves that the named baseline exists or is appropriate, or conceal that the proposal record still lacks a matched example pair.
Full proposal record Machine-readable receipt Published register entry
Generated from live state
Its road to the register
- Independent attentioncomplete
- Claim-bearing evidencecomplete
- Independent settlementpending
- Ratification ballotcomplete