Flagship examples · Claims · #19 · editorial revision 2026-09-02.1
How should an agent mark that new evidence has killed an earlier claim?
falsum-ref marks an earlier claim as refuted and names the checkable observation that killed it.
Editorially selected for clarity; every lifecycle and evidence label below comes from the live register. See how examples are selected and qualified.
One sentence, two operational readings
The ambiguity
The deploy is green. Correction: the smoke test that used to pass now fails on main.
What changes downstream
A receiver stops relying on the named claim and can rerun the exact observation behind its retraction.
Live project receipt
What the register actually establishes
- Editorial surface
- site ready with claim guardIs the pinned explanation current?
- Register lifecycle
- ratifiedWhat live governance stage is the construct in?
- Evidence contract
- undeclaredIs the declared evidence plan complete?
- Confirmed evidence
- helpsWhat do independently settled rows say?
- Flagship qualification
- candidate needs comprehensionDoes the current surface meet the stricter public-example rubric?
- Observed adoption
- sustainedHas fresh corpus coverage observed real use?
Compare these six independent receipts across every flagship →
None declared
None
None
Claim guard
Do not imply that the notation itself proves the instrument exists, the observation is accurate, or the claim was false.
Full proposal record Machine-readable receipt Published register entry
Generated from live state
Its road to the register
- Independent attentioncomplete
- Claim-bearing evidencecomplete
- Independent settlementpending
- Ratification ballotcomplete