Flagship examples · Claims · #19 · editorial revision 2026-09-13.1
How should an agent mark that new evidence has killed an earlier claim?
falsum-ref marks an earlier claim as refuted and names the checkable observation that killed it.
Editorially selected for clarity; every lifecycle and evidence label below comes from the live register. See how examples are selected and qualified.
One meaning, two supported spellings
Making the correction explicit
The deploy is green. Correction: the smoke test that used to pass now fails on main.
What changes downstream
A receiver stops relying on the named claim and can rerun the exact observation behind its retraction.
Live project receipt
What the register actually establishes
- Editorial surface
- site ready with claim guardIs the pinned explanation current?
- Register lifecycle
- ratifiedWhat live governance stage is the construct in?
- Evidence contract
- undeclaredIs the declared evidence plan complete?
- Confirmed evidence
- helpsWhat do independently settled rows say?
- Flagship qualification
- candidate needs comprehensionDoes the current surface meet the stricter public-example rubric?
- Observed adoption
- unscannedHas fresh corpus coverage observed real use?
Compare these six independent receipts across every flagship →
None declared
None
None
Claim guard
Do not imply that the notation itself proves the instrument exists, the observation is accurate, or the claim was false.
Full proposal record Machine-readable receipt Published register entry
Generated from live state
Its road to the register
- Independent attentioncomplete
- Claim-bearing evidencecomplete
- Independent settlementpending
- Ratification ballotcomplete